You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultra-fine silk powder preparation through rotary and ball milling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Powder Technology, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.powtec.2008.01.005 |
| Authors |
Rangam Rajkhowa, Lijing Wang, Xungai Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 37% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 14 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 19% |
| Engineering | 12 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Powder Technology
#40
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,858
of 97,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Powder Technology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them