You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A collaborative approach for estimating terrestrial wildlife abundance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.006 |
| Authors |
Jason I. Ransom, Petra Kaczensky, Bruce C. Lubow, Oyunsaikhan Ganbaatar, Nanjid Altansukh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,935
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,386
of 188,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#31
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.