↓ Skip to main content

Psychiatric Aspects of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychiatric Aspects of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11920-010-0105-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boudewijn Van Houdenhove, Stefan Kempke, Patrick Luyten

Abstract

Chronic fatigue syndrome and/or fibromyalgia (CFS/FM) consists of highly overlapping, medically unexplained symptoms, including long-lasting fatigue, effort intolerance, cognitive dysfunction, and widespread pain and tenderness. CFS/FM often seems to be triggered by infections and physical trauma, but depression, sleep disturbances, and personality may also be involved. Moreover, dysregulation of the stress system, the immune system, and central pain mechanisms may determine the pathophysiology of the illness, leading to a loss of capacity to adapt to all kind of stressors. CFS/FM patients can be best helped by a pragmatic and individualized approach aimed at adjusting lifestyle and optimizing self-care, which in the long run may contribute to a restoration of physical and mental adaptability. Future psychiatric research into CFS/FM should focus on the complex interrelationships among pain/fatigue, stress/depression, and personality, as well as on processes of therapeutic change and the advantages of customized treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 137 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 21%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 32 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,338,875
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#529
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,931
of 104,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.