↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Review: Annual Incidence of ACL Injury and Surgery in Various Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 580)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
254 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
670 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Review: Annual Incidence of ACL Injury and Surgery in Various Populations
Published in
Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation, June 2012
DOI 10.1080/15438627.2012.680633
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bassam Moses, John Orchard, Jessica Orchard

Abstract

Accurate documentation of injury incidence is critical for study of injury risk factors and prevention. Comparisons of published incidences of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and surgical reconstructions are difficult, however, because of the variations in units. Some studies report absolute time-based denominators (such as annual incidence or incidence per 100,000 person years), whereas others report exposure-based denominators (such as incidence per 1,000 player hours or athlete exposures). We converted exposure-based units into annual incidences to compare various studies. National population studies show annual incidence rates of up to 0.05% per person per year in Australia. Professional athletes in basketball, soccer, and the other football codes report an annual incidence of 0.15%-3.7% in studies with at least a moderate sample size. Annual ACL incidence in amateur sporting groups was generally higher than the entire population but lower than among professional athletes. Converting incidence rates to annual units allowed better comparisons to be made between population rates across different studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 670 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 657 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 155 23%
Student > Master 104 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 8%
Researcher 41 6%
Student > Postgraduate 33 5%
Other 80 12%
Unknown 201 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 166 25%
Sports and Recreations 114 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 100 15%
Engineering 29 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 1%
Other 26 4%
Unknown 226 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#848,023
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation
#21
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,303
of 177,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them