You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The CEP5 Peptide Promotes Abiotic Stress Tolerance, As Revealed by Quantitative Proteomics, and Attenuates the AUX/IAA Equilibrium in Arabidopsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1074/mcp.ra119.001826 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Smith, Shanshuo Zhu, Lisa Joos, Ianto Roberts, Natalia Nikonorova, Lam Dai Vu, Elisabeth Stes, Hyunwoo Cho, Antoine Larrieu, Wei Xuan, Benjamin Goodall, Brigitte van de Cotte, Jessic Marie Waite, Adeline Rigal, Sigurd Ramans Harborough, Geert Persiau, Steffen Vanneste, Gwendolyn K. Kirschner, Elien Vandermarliere, Lennart Martens, Yvonne Stahl, Dominique Audenaert, Jirí Friml, Georg Felix, Rüdiger Simon, Malcolm J. Bennett, Anthony Bishopp, Geert De Jaeger, Karin Ljung, Stefan Kepinski, Stephanie Robert, Jennifer Nemhauser, Ildoo Hwang, Kris Gevaert, Tom Beeckman, Ive De Smet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 24% |
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 2 | 6% |
| Russia | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 58% |
| Scientists | 13 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 27% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,032,773
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
#268
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,270
of 421,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Proteomics
#9
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.