You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Naloxone Fails to Antagonize Initial Hypoalgesic Effect of a Manual Therapy Treatment for Lateral Epicondylalgia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.12.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aatit Paungmali, Shaun O’Leary, Tina Souvlis, Bill Vicenzino |
| Abstract |
Recent research has shown that Mulligan's Mobilization With Movement treatment technique for the elbow (MWM), a peripheral joint mobilization technique, produces a substantial and immediate pain relief in chronic lateral epicondylalgia (48% increase in pain-free grip strength).([1]) This hypoalgesic effect is far greater than that previously reported with spinal manual therapy treatments, prompting speculation that peripheral manual therapy treatments may differ in mechanism of action to spinal manual therapy techniques. Naloxone antagonism and tolerance studies, which employ widely accepted tests for the identification of endogenous opioid-mediated pain control mechanisms, have shown that spinal manual therapy-induced hypoalgesia does not involve an opioid mechanism. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 36% |
| Ghana | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 54 | 26% |
| Unknown | 27 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,787,983
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#337
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,101
of 63,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.