↓ Skip to main content

A Four‐Probiotics Regimen Reduces Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Study

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
A Four‐Probiotics Regimen Reduces Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Study
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00268-015-3071-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katerina Kotzampassi, George Stavrou, Georgia Damoraki, Marianna Georgitsi, George Basdanis, Georgia Tsaousi, Evangelos J. Giamarellos‐Bourboulis

Abstract

Heterogeneous results of published studies led to conduct a randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of a new formulation of four probiotics as prophylaxis for complications after colorectal surgery. A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study was conducted enrolling patients undergoing colorectal surgery for cancer. Capsules of placebo or of a formulation containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. p lantarum, Bifidobacterium lactis and Saccharomyces boulardii were administered starting one day before operation and continuing for another 15 days postoperatively. Patients were followed up for 30 days with the development of postoperative complications as the primary outcome. Gene expression and serum levels of cytokines were measured on postoperative day 4 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02313519). The study was prematurely stopped after enrolment due to efficacy in the primary outcome. Administration of probiotics significantly decreased the rate of all postoperative major complication (28.6 vs. 48.8 % of the placebo arm, p 0.010, odds ratio 0.42). Major benefit was found in the reduction of the rate of postoperative pneumonia (2.4 vs. 11.3 %, p 0.029), of surgical site infections (7.1 vs. 20.0 %, p 0.020) and of anastomotic leakage (1.2 vs. 8.8 %, p 0.031). The time until hospital discharge was shortened as well. Gene expression of SOCS3 was positively related with gene expression of TNF and of circulating IL-6 in the probiotic group but not in the placebo group. The studied probiotic formulation significantly decreased the risk of postoperative complications, namely mechanical ventilation, infections and anastomotic leakage. Modulation of the gene expression of SOCS3 is one suggested mechanism ( www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02313519).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Other 22 9%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Master 20 9%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 72 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 6%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 84 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,766,517
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#2,903
of 4,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,452
of 264,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#18
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.