↓ Skip to main content

Testing glacial isostatic adjustment models of last-interglacial sea level history in the Bahamas and Bermuda

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing glacial isostatic adjustment models of last-interglacial sea level history in the Bahamas and Bermuda
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106212
Authors

Daniel R. Muhs, Kathleen R. Simmons, R. Randall Schumann, Eugene S. Schweig, Mark P. Rowe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 43%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,252,521
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#371
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,475
of 396,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#14
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.