↓ Skip to main content

司法権の独立と司法権のあり方

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Legal Philosophy, April 1957
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
司法権の独立と司法権のあり方
Published in
The Annals of Legal Philosophy, April 1957
DOI 10.11205/jalp1953.1956.47
Authors

横川 敏雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,369,852
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Legal Philosophy
#5
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168
of 1,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Legal Philosophy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them