You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Titania - water interactions: a review of theoretical studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Chemistry, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c0jm01491e |
| Authors |
Chenghua Sun, Li-Min Liu, Annabella Selloni, Gao Qing Lu, Sean C. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 29% |
| Researcher | 43 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 70 | 36% |
| Materials Science | 29 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 13 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,776,923
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Chemistry
#577
of 16,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,889
of 164,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Chemistry
#35
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.