You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ポビドンヨード(イソジン®)製剤の動物コロナウイルスに対する抗ウイルス活性
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Animal Clinical Medicine, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.11252/dobutsurinshoigaku.13.1 |
| Authors |
戸澤 あきつ, 恒光 裕, 岡本 清虎, 谷口 隆秀, 八代 純子, 本多 英一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,281,077
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Clinical Medicine
#15
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,914
of 89,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Clinical Medicine
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.