↓ Skip to main content

Racism and responsibility – The critical limits of deepfake methodology in security studies: A reply to Howell and Richter-Montpetit

Overview of attention for article published in Security Dialogue, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 613)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
613 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Racism and responsibility – The critical limits of deepfake methodology in security studies: A reply to Howell and Richter-Montpetit
Published in
Security Dialogue, May 2020
DOI 10.1177/0967010620916153
Authors

Ole Wæver, Barry Buzan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 613 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 57 50%
Arts and Humanities 12 11%
Unspecified 3 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 473. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#58,060
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Security Dialogue
#2
of 613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,365
of 422,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Security Dialogue
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.