Title |
Use of Prone Positioning in Nonintubated Patients With COVID-19 and Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1001/jama.2020.8255 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xavier Elharrar, Youssef Trigui, Anne-Marie Dols, François Touchon, Stéphanie Martinez, Eloi Prud’homme, Laurent Papazian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 537 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 94 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 27 | 5% |
France | 21 | 4% |
Spain | 20 | 4% |
Mexico | 19 | 4% |
Colombia | 18 | 3% |
Japan | 14 | 3% |
Canada | 9 | 2% |
Brazil | 8 | 1% |
Other | 96 | 18% |
Unknown | 211 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 393 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 80 | 15% |
Scientists | 56 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 519 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 519 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 63 | 12% |
Researcher | 59 | 11% |
Student > Master | 49 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 40 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 7% |
Other | 107 | 21% |
Unknown | 165 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 221 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 1% |
Engineering | 6 | 1% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | <1% |
Other | 29 | 6% |
Unknown | 195 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 369. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#87,609
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,522
of 36,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,270
of 435,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#81
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.