↓ Skip to main content

α-Conotoxin AuIB Isomers Exhibit Distinct Inhibitory Mechanisms and Differential Sensitivity to Stoichiometry of α3β4 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
α-Conotoxin AuIB Isomers Exhibit Distinct Inhibitory Mechanisms and Differential Sensitivity to Stoichiometry of α3β4 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, May 2010
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m110.111880
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton A. Grishin, Ching-I A. Wang, Markus Muttenthaler, Paul F. Alewood, Richard J. Lewis, David J. Adams

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 29%
Chemistry 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#32,957
of 85,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,064
of 103,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#165
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.