↓ Skip to main content

DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents’ Choices Regarding Genome‐Wide Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents’ Choices Regarding Genome‐Wide Sequencing
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10897-016-9971-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Birch, S. Adam, N. Bansback, R. R. Coe, J. Hicklin, A. Lehman, K. C. Li, J. M. Friedman

Abstract

We describe the rationale, development, and usability testing for an integrated e-learning tool and decision aid for parents facing decisions about genome-wide sequencing (GWS) for their children with a suspected genetic condition. The online tool, DECIDE, is designed to provide decision-support and to promote high quality decisions about undergoing GWS with or without return of optional incidental finding results. DECIDE works by integrating educational material with decision aids. Users may tailor their learning by controlling both the amount of information and its format - text and diagrams and/or short videos. The decision aid guides users to weigh the importance of various relevant factors in their own lives and circumstances. After considering the pros and cons of GWS and return of incidental findings, DECIDE summarizes the user's responses and apparent preferred choices. In a usability study of 16 parents who had already chosen GWS after conventional genetic counselling, all participants found DECIDE to be helpful. Many would have been satisfied to use it alone to guide their GWS decisions, but most would prefer to have the option of consulting a health care professional as well to aid their decision. Further testing is necessary to establish the effectiveness of using DECIDE as an adjunct to or instead of conventional pre-test genetic counselling for clinical genome-wide sequencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 29 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 36 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,865,807
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#296
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,181
of 335,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.