| Title |
Australian and New Zealand consensus statement on the management of lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and myeloma during the COVID‐19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Internal Medicine Journal, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/imj.14859 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pietro Di Ciaccio, Georgia McCaughan, Judith Trotman, Phoebe Joy Ho, Chan Y. Cheah, Shane Gangatharan, Joel Wight, Matthew Ku, Hang Quach, Robin Gasiorowski, Mark N. Polizzotto, Henry Miles Prince, Stephen Mulligan, Constantine S. Tam, Gareth Gregory, Greg Hapgood, Andrew Spencer, Michael Dickinson, Maya Latimer, Anna Johnston, Tasman Armytage, Cindy Lee, Tara Cochrane, Leanne Berkhahn, Robert Weinkove, Richard Doocey, Simon J. Harrison, Nicholas Webber, Hui‐Peng Lee, Scott Chapman, Belinda A. Campbell, Simon D. J. Gibbs, Nada Hamad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 53% |
| Algeria | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 198 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 22% |
| Unknown | 67 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 74 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,464,008
of 24,047,183 outputs
Outputs from Internal Medicine Journal
#91
of 2,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,296
of 391,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal Medicine Journal
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,047,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.