You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The amount and type of dairy product intake and incident type 2 diabetes: results from the EPIC-InterAct Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.111.021907 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ivonne Sluijs, Nita G Forouhi, Joline WJ Beulens, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Claudia Agnoli, Larraitz Arriola, Beverley Balkau, Aurelio Barricarte, Heiner Boeing, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Francesca L Crowe, Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain, Dagmar Drogan, Paul W Franks, Diana Gavrila, Carlos Gonzalez, Jytte Halkjær, Rudolf Kaaks, Aurelie Moskal, Peter Nilsson, Kim Overvad, Domenico Palli, Salvatore Panico, José R Quirós, Fulvio Ricceri, Sabina Rinaldi, Olov Rolandsson, Carlotta Sacerdote, María-José Sánchez, Nadia Slimani, Annemieke MW Spijkerman, Birgit Teucher, Anne Tjonneland, María-José Tormo, Rosario Tumino, Daphne L van der A, Stephen J Sharp, Claudia Langenberg, Edith JM Feskens, Elio Riboli, Nicholas J Wareham, on behalf of The InterAct Consortium |
| Abstract |
Dairy product intake may be inversely associated with risk of type 2 diabetes, but the evidence is inconclusive for total dairy products and sparse for types of dairy products. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 35% |
| Australia | 5 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 22% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 18% |
| Researcher | 41 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#456,544
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,067
of 12,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,139
of 177,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#15
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.