Title |
Cognitive Load Disrupts Implicit Theory-of-Mind Processing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Psychological Science, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1177/0956797612439070 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dana Schneider, Rebecca Lam, Andrew P. Bayliss, Paul E. Dux |
Abstract |
Eye movements in Sally-Anne false-belief tasks appear to reflect the ability to implicitly monitor the mental states of other individuals (theory of mind, or ToM). It has recently been proposed that an early-developing, efficient, and automatically operating ToM system subserves this ability. Surprisingly absent from the literature, however, is an empirical test of the influence of domain-general executive processing resources on this implicit ToM system. In the study reported here, a dual-task method was employed to investigate the impact of executive load on eye movements in an implicit Sally-Anne false-belief task. Under no-load conditions, adult participants displayed eye movement behavior consistent with implicit belief processing, whereas evidence for belief processing was absent for participants under cognitive load. These findings indicate that the cognitive system responsible for implicitly tracking beliefs draws at least minimally on executive processing resources. Thus, even the most low-level processing of beliefs appears to reflect a capacity-limited operation. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 26% |
Australia | 2 | 9% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
Japan | 2 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
Scientists | 8 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 311 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 23% |
Student > Master | 47 | 14% |
Researcher | 44 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
Other | 66 | 20% |
Unknown | 34 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 186 | 57% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
Linguistics | 9 | 3% |
Other | 40 | 12% |
Unknown | 50 | 15% |