↓ Skip to main content

Guts, Germs, and Meals: The Origin of Type 1 Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Guts, Germs, and Meals: The Origin of Type 1 Diabetes
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11892-012-0298-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Beyan, L. Wen, R. D. Leslie

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is due, in part, to non-genetically determined factors including environmental factors. The nature of these environmental effects remains unclear but they are important to identify since they may be amenable to therapy. Recently, the gut microbiota, the trillions of microorganisms inhabiting the gut, as well as diet, have been implicated in T1DM pathogenesis. Since dietary changes can reshape this complex gut community, its co-evolution could have been altered by changes to our diet, agriculture, personal hygiene, and antibiotic usage, which coincide with the increased incidence of T1DM. Recent studies demonstrate an association between altered gut microbiota and T1DM in both T1DM patients and animal models of the disease. Further studies should provide new insight into those critical host-microbial interactions, potentially suggesting new diagnostic or therapeutic strategies for disease prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,468,024
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#74
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,092
of 177,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.