You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling the Impact of Cardiopulmonary Irradiation on Overall Survival in NRG Oncology Trial RTOG 0617
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2627 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Thor, Joseph O. Deasy, Chen Hu, Elizabeth Gore, Voichita Bar-Ad, Clifford Robinson, Matthew Wheatley, Jung Hun Oh, Jeffrey Bogart, Yolanda I. Garces, Vivek S. Kavadi, Samir Narayan, Puneeth Iyengar, Jacob S. Witt, James W. Welsh, Cristopher D. Koprowski, James M. Larner, Ying Xiao, Jeffrey Bradley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 29% |
| Spain | 5 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 53% |
| Scientists | 21 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,196,228
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#806
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,184
of 426,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#31
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.