You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1038/nature11156 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sandra Misale, Rona Yaeger, Sebastijan Hobor, Elisa Scala, Manickam Janakiraman, David Liska, Emanuele Valtorta, Roberta Schiavo, Michela Buscarino, Giulia Siravegna, Katia Bencardino, Andrea Cercek, Chin-Tung Chen, Silvio Veronese, Carlo Zanon, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Marcello Gambacorta, Margherita Gallicchio, Efsevia Vakiani, Valentina Boscaro, Enzo Medico, Martin Weiser, Salvatore Siena, Federica Di Nicolantonio, David Solit, Alberto Bardelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 22% |
Italy | 1 | 11% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
Austria | 1 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
Japan | 5 | <1% |
Germany | 5 | <1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Other | 11 | <1% |
Unknown | 1170 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 282 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 243 | 20% |
Student > Master | 125 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 100 | 8% |
Other | 68 | 6% |
Other | 211 | 17% |
Unknown | 193 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 298 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 294 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 250 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 31 | 3% |
Engineering | 24 | 2% |
Other | 88 | 7% |
Unknown | 237 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#855,666
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,768
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,314
of 182,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#369
of 956 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 956 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.