| Title |
Mitochondrial DNA paradox: sex-specific genetic structure in a marine mussel – despite maternal inheritance and passive dispersal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomic Data, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2156-13-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter R Teske, Isabelle Papadopoulos, Nigel P Barker, Christopher D McQuaid |
| Abstract |
When genetic structure is identified using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), but no structure is identified using biparentally-inherited nuclear DNA, the discordance is often attributed to differences in dispersal potential between the sexes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#505
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,354
of 181,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.