↓ Skip to main content

Fascination violence: on mind and brain of man hunters

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Fascination violence: on mind and brain of man hunters
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00406-010-0144-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Elbert, Roland Weierstall, Maggie Schauer

Abstract

Why are savagery and violence so omnipresent among humans? We suggest that hunting behaviour is fascinating and attractive, a desire that makes temporary deprivation from physical needs, pain, sweat, blood and, ultimately, the willingness to kill tolerable and even appetitive. Evolutionary development into the "perversion" of the urge to hunt humans, that is to say the transfer of this hunt to members of one's own species, has been nurtured by the resultant advantage of personal and social power and dominance. While a breakdown of the inhibition towards intra-specific killing would endanger any animal species, controlled inhibition was enabled in humans in that higher regulatory systems, such as frontal lobe-based executive functions, prevent the involuntary derailment of hunting behaviour. If this control--such as in child soldiers for example--is not learnt, then brutality towards humans remains fascinating and appealing. Blood must flow in order to kill. It is hence an appetitive cue as is the struggling of the victim. Hunting for men, more rarely for women, is fascinating and emotionally arousing with the parallel release of testosterone, serotonin and endorphins, which can produce feelings of euphoria and alleviate pain. Bonding and social rites (e.g. initiation) set up the constraints for both hunting and violent disputes. Children learn which conditions legitimate aggressive behaviour and which not. Big game hunting as well as attack of other communities is more successful in groups--men also perceive it as more pleasurable. This may explain the fascination with gladiatorial combat, violent computer games but as well ritualized forms like football.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 186 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 36%
Social Sciences 23 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Neuroscience 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,936,938
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#425
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,487
of 103,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.