| Title |
SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abc4776 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abishek Chandrashekar, Jinyan Liu, Amanda J. Martinot, Katherine McMahan, Noe B. Mercado, Lauren Peter, Lisa H. Tostanoski, Jingyou Yu, Zoltan Maliga, Michael Nekorchuk, Kathleen Busman-Sahay, Margaret Terry, Linda M. Wrijil, Sarah Ducat, David R. Martinez, Caroline Atyeo, Stephanie Fischinger, John S. Burke, Matthew D. Slein, Laurent Pessaint, Alex Van Ry, Jack Greenhouse, Tammy Taylor, Kelvin Blade, Anthony Cook, Brad Finneyfrock, Renita Brown, Elyse Teow, Jason Velasco, Roland Zahn, Frank Wegmann, Peter Abbink, Esther A. Bondzie, Gabriel Dagotto, Makda S. Gebre, Xuan He, Catherine Jacob-Dolan, Nicole Kordana, Zhenfeng Li, Michelle A. Lifton, Shant H. Mahrokhian, Lori F. Maxfield, Ramya Nityanandam, Joseph P. Nkolola, Aaron G. Schmidt, Andrew D. Miller, Ralph S. Baric, Galit Alter, Peter K. Sorger, Jacob D. Estes, Hanne Andersen, Mark G. Lewis, Dan H. Barouch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,565 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 882 | 13% |
| Mexico | 689 | 10% |
| Brazil | 255 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 235 | 4% |
| Spain | 213 | 3% |
| Argentina | 180 | 3% |
| Canada | 144 | 2% |
| Colombia | 103 | 2% |
| Turkey | 93 | 1% |
| Other | 771 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3000 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5648 | 86% |
| Scientists | 600 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 219 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 98 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 884 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 884 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 165 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 7% |
| Other | 175 | 20% |
| Unknown | 241 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 155 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 128 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 107 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 8% |
| Engineering | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 134 | 15% |
| Unknown | 270 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,126
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Science
#63
of 83,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100
of 425,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#5
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.