↓ Skip to main content

Quality of Life After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Painful Bone Metastases: Results of an International Study Validating the EORTC QLQ-BM22

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of Life After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Painful Bone Metastases: Results of an International Study Validating the EORTC QLQ-BM22
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang Zeng, Edward Chow, Gillian Bedard, Liying Zhang, Alysa Fairchild, Vassilios Vassiliou, Mohamed A. Alm El-Din, Reynaldo Jesus-Garcia, Aswin Kumar, Fabien Forges, Ling-Ming Tseng, Ming-Feng Hou, Wei-Chu Chie, Andrew Bottomley

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective method of palliating painful bone metastases and can improve function and reduce analgesic requirements. In advanced cancer patients, quality of life (QOL) is the primary outcome of interest over traditional endpoints such as survival. The purpose of our study was to compare bone metastasis-specific QOL scores among patients who responded differently to palliative RT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Other 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#7,549
of 11,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,197
of 177,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#53
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.