You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What stresses remote area nurses? Current knowledge and future action
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian Journal of Rural Health, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2009.01073.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue Lenthall, John Wakerman, Tess Opie, Maureen Dollard, Sandra Dunn, Sabina Knight, Martha MacLeod, Colin Watson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Psychology | 12 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#158
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,074
of 122,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them