↓ Skip to main content

How Do Different Forms of Foreign Aid Affect Government Legitimacy? Evidence from an Informational Experiment in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in Comparative International Development, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Do Different Forms of Foreign Aid Affect Government Legitimacy? Evidence from an Informational Experiment in Uganda
Published in
Studies in Comparative International Development, May 2020
DOI 10.1007/s12116-020-09303-8
Authors

Kate Baldwin, Matthew S. Winters

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,429,927
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#129
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,688
of 424,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them