↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of discriminatory treatment by staff as predictors of drug treatment completion: Utility of a mixed methods approach

Overview of attention for article published in Drug & Alcohol Review, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptions of discriminatory treatment by staff as predictors of drug treatment completion: Utility of a mixed methods approach
Published in
Drug & Alcohol Review, September 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00173.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

LOREN BRENER, WILLIAM VON HIPPEL, COURTNEY VON HIPPEL, ILYSE RESNICK, CARLA TRELOAR

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 26%
Social Sciences 21 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 41 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,570,348
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drug & Alcohol Review
#440
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,649
of 103,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug & Alcohol Review
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.