↓ Skip to main content

Land crabs as key drivers in tropical coastal forest recruitment

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Land crabs as key drivers in tropical coastal forest recruitment
Published in
Biological Reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00070.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin Stewart Lindquist, Ken W. Krauss, Peter T. Green, Dennis J. O’Dowd, Peter M. Sherman, Thomas J. Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Colombia 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 143 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Professor 12 8%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 47%
Environmental Science 38 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,082,312
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#270
of 1,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,232
of 82,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them