You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining the characteristics of intermediate care models including transitional care: an international Delphi study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-020-01579-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duygu Sezgin, Rónán O’Caoimh, Mark R. O’Donovan, Mohamed A. Salem, Siobhán Kennelly, Luz Lopez Samaniego, Cristina Arnal Carda, Rafael Rodriguez-Acuña, Marco Inzitari, Teija Hammar, Claire Holditch, Janet Prvu Bettger, Martin Vernon, Áine Carroll, Felix Gradinger, Gaston Perman, Martin Wilson, Antoine Vella, Antonio Cherubini, Helen Tucker, Maria Pia Fantini, Graziano Onder, Regina Roller-Wirnsberger, Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo, Matteo Cesari, Paula Bertoluci, Magdalena Kieliszek, Wilma van der Vlegel-Brouwer, Michelle Nelson, Leocadio Rodríguez Mañas, Eleftheria Antoniadou, François Barriere, Sebastian Lindblom, Grace Park, Isidoro Pérez, Dolores Alguacil, Douglas Lowdon, Maria Eugenia Alkiza, Cristina Alonso Bouzon, John Young, Ana Carriazo, Aaron Liew, Anne Hendry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 16% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,474,991
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#80
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,510
of 424,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#5
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.