You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
WNT16 Influences Bone Mineral Density, Cortical Bone Thickness, Bone Strength, and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002745 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hou-Feng Zheng, Jon H. Tobias, Emma Duncan, David M. Evans, Joel Eriksson, Lavinia Paternoster, Laura M. Yerges-Armstrong, Terho Lehtimäki, Ulrica Bergström, Mika Kähönen, Paul J. Leo, Olli Raitakari, Marika Laaksonen, Geoffrey C. Nicholson, Jorma Viikari, Martin Ladouceur, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Carolina Medina-Gomez, Fernando Rivadeneira, Richard L. Prince, Harri Sievanen, William D. Leslie, Dan Mellström, John A. Eisman, Sofia Movérare-Skrtic, David Goltzman, David A. Hanley, Graeme Jones, Beate St. Pourcain, Yongjun Xiao, Nicholas J. Timpson, George Davey Smith, Ian R. Reid, Susan M. Ring, Philip N. Sambrook, Magnus Karlsson, Elaine M. Dennison, John P. Kemp, Patrick Danoy, Adrian Sayers, Scott G. Wilson, Maria Nethander, Eugene McCloskey, Liesbeth Vandenput, Richard Eastell, Jeff Liu, Tim Spector, Braxton D. Mitchell, Elizabeth A. Streeten, Robert Brommage, Ulrika Pettersson-Kymmer, Matthew A. Brown, Claes Ohlsson, J. Brent Richards, Mattias Lorentzon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,307,108
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#2,735
of 9,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,021
of 179,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#37
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.