| Title |
Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-014-3187-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. E. Jones, L. C. Roberts, P. S. Little, M. A. Mullee, J. A. Cleland, C. Cooper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Ireland | 2 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 21% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 24% |
| Psychology | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,009,882
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#282
of 5,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,190
of 322,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#6
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,277 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.