You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of ALK in Thinness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.034 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Orthofer, Armand Valsesia, Reedik Mägi, Qiao-Ping Wang, Joanna Kaczanowska, Ivona Kozieradzki, Alexandra Leopoldi, Domagoj Cikes, Lydia M Zopf, Evgenii O Tretiakov, Egon Demetz, Richard Hilbe, Anna Boehm, Melita Ticevic, Margit Nõukas, Alexander Jais, Katrin Spirk, Teleri Clark, Sabine Amann, Maarja Lepamets, Christoph Neumayr, Cosmas Arnold, Zhengchao Dou, Volker Kuhn, Maria Novatchkova, Shane J F Cronin, Uwe J F Tietge, Simone Müller, J Andrew Pospisilik, Vanja Nagy, Chi-Chung Hui, Jelena Lazovic, Harald Esterbauer, Astrid Hagelkruys, Ivan Tancevski, Florian W Kiefer, Tibor Harkany, Wulf Haubensak, G Gregory Neely, Andres Metspalu, Jorg Hager, Nele Gheldof, Josef M Penninger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 245 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 6% |
| Canada | 10 | 4% |
| Brazil | 9 | 4% |
| Austria | 8 | 3% |
| India | 7 | 3% |
| Japan | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Estonia | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 95 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 151 | 62% |
| Scientists | 67 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 59 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 68 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 687. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#30,857
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#225
of 17,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,440
of 425,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#18
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.