| Title |
Acceptance of technology-enhanced learning for a theoretical radiological science course: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-12-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emeka Nkenke, Elefterios Vairaktaris, Anne Bauersachs, Stephan Eitner, Alexander Budach, Christoph Knipfer, Florian Stelzle |
| Abstract |
Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) gives a view to improved education. However, there is a need to clarify how TEL can be used effectively. The study compared students' attitudes and opinions towards a traditional face-to-face course on theoretical radiological science and a TEL course where students could combine face-to-face lectures and e-learning modules at their best convenience. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Psychology | 11 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,160,460
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#3,115
of 3,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,441
of 160,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.