↓ Skip to main content

現代文化における生物多様性の貢献 : ポケモンにおけるその定量分析

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Forum, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
現代文化における生物多様性の貢献 : ポケモンにおけるその定量分析
Published in
Wildlife Forum, July 2015
DOI 10.20798/wildlifeforum.20.1_26
Authors

宮下 健太郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,273,087
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Forum
#1
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,194
of 278,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Forum
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them