| Title |
Effectiveness of different post-diagnostic dementia care models delivered by primary care: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x710165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachael Frost, Kate Walters, Su Aw, Greta Brunskill, Jane Wilcock, Louise Robinson, Martin Knapp, Karen Harrison Dening, Louise Allan, Jill Manthorpe, Greta Rait, on behalf of the PriDem Study project team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 58% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,276,114
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#600
of 4,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,405
of 396,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#19
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.