| Title |
Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire M Rickard, Damhnat McCann, Jane Munnings, Matthew R McGrail |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,260,582
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,241
of 4,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,137
of 105,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.