↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the directed information to infer causal relationships in ensemble neural spike train recordings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Estimating the directed information to infer causal relationships in ensemble neural spike train recordings
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10827-010-0247-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J. Quinn, Todd P. Coleman, Negar Kiyavash, Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos

Abstract

Advances in recording technologies have given neuroscience researchers access to large amounts of data, in particular, simultaneous, individual recordings of large groups of neurons in different parts of the brain. A variety of quantitative techniques have been utilized to analyze the spiking activities of the neurons to elucidate the functional connectivity of the recorded neurons. In the past, researchers have used correlative measures. More recently, to better capture the dynamic, complex relationships present in the data, neuroscientists have employed causal measures-most of which are variants of Granger causality-with limited success. This paper motivates the directed information, an information and control theoretic concept, as a modality-independent embodiment of Granger's original notion of causality. Key properties include: (a) it is nonzero if and only if one process causally influences another, and (b) its specific value can be interpreted as the strength of a causal relationship. We next describe how the causally conditioned directed information between two processes given knowledge of others provides a network version of causality: it is nonzero if and only if, in the presence of the present and past of other processes, one process causally influences another. This notion is shown to be able to differentiate between true direct causal influences, common inputs, and cascade effects in more two processes. We next describe a procedure to estimate the directed information on neural spike trains using point process generalized linear models, maximum likelihood estimation and information-theoretic model order selection. We demonstrate that on a simulated network of neurons, it (a) correctly identifies all pairwise causal relationships and (b) correctly identifies network causal relationships. This procedure is then used to analyze ensemble spike train recordings in primary motor cortex of an awake monkey while performing target reaching tasks, uncovering causal relationships whose directionality are consistent with predictions made from the wave propagation of simultaneously recorded local field potentials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 6%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 257 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 38%
Researcher 62 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 7%
Professor 19 6%
Student > Master 17 6%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 20 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 64 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 18%
Neuroscience 40 13%
Computer Science 37 12%
Physics and Astronomy 21 7%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 31 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,309,495
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#222
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,189
of 93,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.