↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary analysis and molecular dissection of caveola biogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Science, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary analysis and molecular dissection of caveola biogenesis
Published in
Journal of Cell Science, May 2008
DOI 10.1242/jcs.024588
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Kirkham, Susan J. Nixon, Mark T. Howes, Laurent Abi-Rached, Diane E. Wakeham, Michael Hanzal-Bayer, Charles Ferguson, Michelle M. Hill, Manuel Fernandez-Rojo, Deborah A. Brown, John F. Hancock, Frances M. Brodsky, Robert G. Parton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
India 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 85 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 23%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Science
#1,849
of 9,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,071
of 98,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Science
#10
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.