↓ Skip to main content

2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
607 X users
facebook
65 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
571 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1594 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, May 2016
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare L Ardern, Philip Glasgow, Anthony Schneiders, Erik Witvrouw, Benjamin Clarsen, Ann Cools, Boris Gojanovic, Steffan Griffin, Karim M Khan, Håvard Moksnes, Stephen A Mutch, Nicola Phillips, Gustaaf Reurink, Robin Sadler, Karin Grävare Silbernagel, Kristian Thorborg, Arnlaug Wangensteen, Kevin E Wilk, Mario Bizzini

Abstract

Deciding when to return to sport after injury is complex and multifactorial-an exercise in risk management. Return to sport decisions are made every day by clinicians, athletes and coaches, ideally in a collaborative way. The purpose of this consensus statement was to present and synthesise current evidence to make recommendations for return to sport decision-making, clinical practice and future research directions related to returning athletes to sport. A half day meeting was held in Bern, Switzerland, after the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy. 17 expert clinicians participated. 4 main sections were initially agreed upon, then participants elected to join 1 of the 4 groups-each group focused on 1 section of the consensus statement. Participants in each group discussed and summarised the key issues for their section before the 17-member group met again for discussion to reach consensus on the content of the 4 sections. Return to sport is not a decision taken in isolation at the end of the recovery and rehabilitation process. Instead, return to sport should be viewed as a continuum, paralleled with recovery and rehabilitation. Biopsychosocial models may help the clinician make sense of individual factors that may influence the athlete's return to sport, and the Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance framework may help decision-makers synthesise information to make an optimal return to sport decision. Research evidence to support return to sport decisions in clinical practice is scarce. Future research should focus on a standardised approach to defining, measuring and reporting return to sport outcomes, and identifying valuable prognostic factors for returning to sport.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 607 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,594 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Andorra 1 <1%
Unknown 1585 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 297 19%
Student > Bachelor 236 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 7%
Other 105 7%
Researcher 87 5%
Other 297 19%
Unknown 460 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 326 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 316 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 311 20%
Social Sciences 19 1%
Engineering 16 1%
Other 93 6%
Unknown 513 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 457. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#61,040
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#170
of 6,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,278
of 352,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#8
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.