↓ Skip to main content

Plant Invasions in Mountains: Global Lessons for Better Management

Overview of attention for article published in Mountain Research & Development, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant Invasions in Mountains: Global Lessons for Better Management
Published in
Mountain Research & Development, November 2011
DOI 10.1659/mrd-journal-d-11-00082.1
Authors

Keith L. McDougall, Anzar A. Khuroo, Lloyd L. Loope, Catherine G. Parks, Anbal Pauchard, Zafar A. Reshi, Ian Rushworth, Christoph Kueffer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 21%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Other 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 37%
Environmental Science 31 24%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Mountain Research & Development
#176
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,341
of 153,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mountain Research & Development
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them