↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of pelagic species decline in the upper San Francisco Estuary using multivariate autoregressive modeling (MAR)

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of pelagic species decline in the upper San Francisco Estuary using multivariate autoregressive modeling (MAR)
Published in
Ecological Applications, July 2010
DOI 10.1890/09-1724.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralph Mac Nally, James R. Thomson, Wim J. Kimmerer, Frederick Feyrer, Ken B. Newman, Andy Sih, William A. Bennett, Larry Brown, Erica Fleishman, Steven D. Culberson, Gonzalo Castillo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
Canada 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 134 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 19 13%
Other 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 40%
Environmental Science 52 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 15 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,254,039
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,819
of 3,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,920
of 98,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.