You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Central corneal thickness and biomechanical changes after clear corneal phacoemulsification.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Refractive Surgery, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3928/1081597x-20111103-02 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno de Freitas Valbon, Marcelo Palis Ventura, Renata Siqueira da Silva, Ana Laura Canedo, Guillermo Coca Velarde, Renato Ambrósio |
| Abstract |
To evaluate central corneal thickness (CCT) and ocular biomechanical properties in patients before and after clear corneal phacoemulsification. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 81% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2012.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Refractive Surgery
#934
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,041
of 245,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Refractive Surgery
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.