↓ Skip to main content

Challenging a Dogma of Exercise Physiology

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Challenging a Dogma of Exercise Physiology
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200838060-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian W. Midgley, David J. Bentley, Hans Luttikholt, Lars R. McNaughton, Gregoire P. Millet

Abstract

A widely cited recommendation is that to elicit valid maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2 max)) values, incremental exercise tests should last between 8 and 12 minutes. However, this recommendation originated from the findings of a single experimental study conducted by Buchfuhrer et al. in 1983. Although this study is an important contribution to scientific knowledge, it should not be viewed as sufficient evidence to support the recommendation for eliciting valid VO(2 max) values. At least eight studies have reported that durations as short as 5 minutes and as long as 26 minutes elicit VO(2 max) values similar to those derived from tests of 8-12 minutes' duration. Two studies reported that the shorter test protocols elicited significantly higher VO(2 max) values in untrained men and women. In three studies that reported significantly higher VO(2 max) values determined during tests of 8-12 minutes than during more prolonged tests, the prolonged tests were associated with maximal treadmill grades of 20-25%, compared with 6-10% in the shorter tests. Therefore, intolerable treadmill grades, rather than the prolonged test duration, may have limited the ability to elicit VO(2 max). In view of the available evidence, test administrators, reviewers and journal editors should not view 8-12 minutes' duration for incremental exercise tests as obligatory for valid VO(2 max) determination. Current evidence suggests that to elicit valid VO(2 max) values, cycle ergometer tests should last between 7 and 26 minutes and treadmill tests between 5 and 26 minutes. This is dependent on the qualification that short tests are preceded by an adequate warm-up and that treadmill grades do not exceed 15%. Current research is too limited to indicate appropriate test duration ranges for discontinuous test protocols, or protocols incorporating high treadmill grades.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 190 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Other 10 5%
Other 47 23%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 92 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 38 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,471,064
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,020
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,778
of 193,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#406
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.