You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimation of the dietary requirement for vitamin D in healthy adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26594 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin D Cashman, Tom R Hill, Alice J Lucey, Nicola Taylor, Kelly M Seamans, Siobhan Muldowney, Anthony P FitzGerald, Albert Flynn, Maria S Barnes, Geraldine Horigan, Maxine P Bonham, Emeir M Duffy, JJ Strain, Julie MW Wallace, Mairead Kiely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,259,644
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#5,324
of 12,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,385
of 184,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#78
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.