↓ Skip to main content

Fast and accurate prediction of positive and negative urine cultures by flow cytometry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Fast and accurate prediction of positive and negative urine cultures by flow cytometry
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-1557-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bijan Moshaver, Foppie de Boer, Heidi van Egmond-Kreileman, Ellen Kramer, Coen Stegeman, Paul Groeneveld

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a widespread infectious disease in humans. Urine culture, a huge workload in the microbiology laboratory, is still the standard diagnostic test for UTI, but most of the cultures are negative. A reliable screening method could reduce unnecessary cultures and quicken reporting of negative results. We evaluated the usefulness of a flow cytometry (FC) screening method in the prediction of positive urine culture to reduce the number of urine cultures. The urine specimens sent to the laboratory for culture were tested with the flow cytometer Accuri C6. FC bacterial counts were compared to standard urine culture results to assess the best cut-off values. Two hundred nine urine samples were included, of which 79 (37.8 %) were culture positive. On comparing the culture and the FC data in the ROC curve, the FC bacterial counts of ≥10(6) bacteria/mL provided a reliable screening for bacteriuria with a sensitivity and specificity of 99 and 58 %, respectively. All negative FC results (<10(6) bacteria/mL) showed a negative predictive value of 99 % with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02. The FC bacterial counts of ≥10(8)/mL showed a positive predictive value of 99 % with a positive likelihood ratio of 60.9. Counting bacteria in human urine samples by the FC is a fast, accurate and cost-effective screening method for bacteriuria. Our results showed that FC is able to rule out UTI, which can lead to a substantial reduction (36 %) of urine cultures. It also demonstrated that this method predicts positive cultures accurately.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,009,265
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,262
of 7,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,994
of 327,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#47
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.