↓ Skip to main content

Can Money Prevent the Spread of HIV? A Review of Cash Payments for HIV Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
Can Money Prevent the Spread of HIV? A Review of Cash Payments for HIV Prevention
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10461-012-0240-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audrey Pettifor, Catherine MacPhail, Nadia Nguyen, Molly Rosenberg

Abstract

Cash payments to improve health outcomes have been used for many years; however, their use for HIV prevention is new and the impact not yet well understood. We provide a brief background on the rationale behind using cash to improve health outcomes, review current studies completed or underway using cash for prevention of sexual transmission of HIV, and outline some key considerations on the use of cash payments to prevent HIV infections. We searched the literature for studies that implemented cash transfer programs and measured HIV or HIV-related outcomes. We identified 16 studies meeting our criteria; 10 are completed. The majority of studies have been conducted with adolescents in developing countries and payments are focused on addressing structural risk factors such as poverty. Most have seen reductions in sexual behavior and one large trial has documented a difference in HIV prevalence between young women getting cash transfers and those not. Cash transfer programs focused on changing risky sexual behaviors to reduce HIV risk suggest promise. The context in which programs are situated, the purpose of the cash transfer, and the population will all affect the impact of such programs; ongoing RCTs with HIV incidence endpoints will shed more light on the efficacy of cash payments as strategy for HIV prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 19%
Researcher 41 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 61 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 30 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 54 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,189,599
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#125
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,707
of 165,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#2
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.