| Title |
Constraints on Z′ models from LHC dijet searches and implications for dark matter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of High Energy Physics, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/jhep09(2016)018 |
| Authors |
Malcolm Fairbairn, John Heal, Felix Kahlhoefer, Patrick Tunney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 33% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#2,861
of 24,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,289
of 346,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#49
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.