↓ Skip to main content

Allograft augmentation in proximal humerus fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Allograft augmentation in proximal humerus fractures
Published in
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00064-016-0446-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. A. Euler, F. S. Kralinger, C. Hengg, M. Wambacher, M. Blauth

Abstract

Achieve stable fixation to initially start full range of motion (ROM) and to prevent secondary displacement in unstable fracture patterns and/or weak and osteoporotic bone. (Secondarily) displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) with an unstable medial hinge and substantial bony deficiency, weak/osteoporotic bone, pre-existing psychiatric illnesses or patient incompliance to obey instructions. Open/contaminated fractures, systemic immunodeficiency, prior graft-versus-host reaction. Deltopectoral approach. Identification of the rotator cuff. Disimpaction and reduction of the fracture, preparation of the situs. Graft preparation. Allografting. Fracture closure. Plate attachment. Definitive plate fixation. Radiological documentation. Postoperative shoulder fixation (sling). Cryotherapy, anti-inflammatory medication on demand. Shoulder sling for comfort. Full active physical therapy as tolerated without pain. Postoperative radiographs (anteroposterior, outlet, and axial [as tolerated] views) and clinical follow-up after 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Bony union and allograft incorporation in 9 of 10 noncompliant, high-risk patients (median age 63 years) after a mean follow-up of 28.5 months. The median Constant-Murley Score was 72.0 (range 45-86). Compared to the uninjured contralateral side, flexion was impaired by 13 %, abduction by 14 %, and external rotation by 15 %. Mean correction of the initial varus displacement was 38° (51° preoperatively to 13° postoperatively).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,330,976
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie
#45
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,881
of 334,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them