| Title |
Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniele Giacoppo, Fernando Alfonso, Bo Xu, Bimmer E.P.M. Claessen, Tom Adriaenssens, Christoph Jensen, María J. Pérez-Vizcayno, Do-Yoon Kang, Ralf Degenhardt, Leos Pleva, Jan Baan, Javier Cuesta, Duk-Woo Park, Pavel Kukla, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Martin Unverdorben, Runlin Gao, Christoph K. Naber, Seung-Jung Park, José P.S. Henriques, Adnan Kastrati, Robert A. Byrne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 9 | 13% |
| Mexico | 8 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Italy | 4 | 6% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 81% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#744,083
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,870
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,203
of 433,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#47
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.